SKU: 65288230845

BKS Zimmertür-Einsteckschloss 0515 BAD 20/ 65/78/8 mm DIN links ( 3322024184 )

Sale price$30.86 Regular price$34.29
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $8.57 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 11 - Aug 16

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

BKS Zimmertür-Einsteckschloss 0515 BAD 20/ 65/78/8 mm DIN links ( 3322024184 )Lieferumfang: 1x BKS Zimmertr Einsteckschloss 0515 BAD 20 65 78 8 mm DIN links Produktbeschreibung: BAD Ausfhrung nach DIN 18251 1 Klasse 3 allseitig geschlossener Schlosskasten 1 tourig Stulplnge 235 mm Entfernung 78 mm Vierkant 8 mm Falle und Riegel aus Zinkdruckguss ohne Schlieblech Weitere technische Daten: Schlosskasten: allseitig geschlossen passend fr: Zimmertren

Lieferumfang:

  • 1x BKS Zimmertür-Einsteckschloss 0515 BAD 20/ 65/78/8 mm DIN links
Produktbeschreibung:

BAD Ausführung · nach DIN 18251-1 Klasse 3 · allseitig geschlossener Schlosskasten · 1-tourig · Stulplänge 235 mm · Entfernung 78 mm · Vierkant 8 mm · Falle und Riegel aus Zinkdruckguss · ohne Schließblech

Weitere technische Daten:
  • Schlosskasten: allseitig geschlossen
  • passend für: Zimmertüren
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 65288230845

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 28 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
C
Verified Purchase
Consumer Reports
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 5
Fit great
Size: Large, Color: (100) White / White / Halo Gray
Been a couple of months and they seem to be holding up nicely. Real picky about fit of socks and these fit well. They are very thin but very comfortable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 21, 2024
B
Verified Purchase
Broussard Household.
Belleville, US
★★★★★ 5
Always a win
Size: Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
Under armor is always a win! Comfortable, no peeling, true to size, no squeezing around the arch of foot & affordable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 4, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
tab
Whiting, US
★★★★★ 4
Fit well and stay up
Size: Large, Color: (299) City Khaki / City Khaki / White
They're a little thin, so good mainly for warmer months. But they fit very well and I've not experienced any slippage
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 17, 2026
G
Verified Purchase
Gustavo Garcia
Natrona Heights, US
★★★★★ 5
Llego a tiempo
Size: X-Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
Bien
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 28, 2026
V
Verified Purchase
ViperMageEx
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 3
Low quality socks.
Size: Large, Color: (001) Black / Black / Castlerock
I have been buying Under Armour undergarments for years and have noticed a steady decline in quality. These socks are no different. I purchased another six packs of very similar styled Under Armour socks in 2023 and recently they have started wearing out. Those socks are no longer available for reorder, but these extremely similar socks were so I ordered them. The quality difference is obvious just by looking at and feeling them. They are more of a faded black/brown than the black pictured or the black that the three year old socks still are. The material is completely different and feels lighter. When wearing them they already feel like they are bunching up in my shoes, which the old ones never did. I do not expect these to last even a year and will not buy them again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 29, 2026

recommand products