Pay in installments of $9.00 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 18 - Jul 23
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
OEM TOYOTA 6791322090E0 FRONT DOOR SCUFF PLATE RH SABLE 67913-22090-E0Brand TOYOTA Product Name FRONT DOOR SCUFF PLATE RH SABLE Product Number 67913 22090 E0 Compatible Car Chaser MARK II (CHASER MARK 2) GX90 JZX90 JZX91 JZX93 LX90 SX90 Compatible Engine 1GFE 1JZGE 1JZGTE 2JZGE 2LTE 4SFE 1GFE 1JZGE 1JZGTE 2JZGE 2LTE 4SFE Product Description Front door scuff plate RH SABLE chaser, with respect to Makutsu Compatible Models: Chaser, Makutsu (CHASER, MARK 2) Chassis Models: GX90, JZX90, JZX91, JZX93, LX90, SX90 fit year:
| Brand | TOYOTA |
| Product Name | FRONT DOOR SCUFF PLATE RH SABLE |
| Product Number | 67913-22090-E0 |
| Compatible Car | Chaser MARK II (CHASER MARK 2) GX90 JZX90 JZX91 JZX93 LX90 SX90 |
| Compatible Engine | 1GFE 1JZGE 1JZGTE 2JZGE 2LTE 4SFE 1GFE 1JZGE 1JZGTE 2JZGE 2LTE 4SFE |
| Product Description | Front door scuff plate RH SABLE chaser, with respect to Makutsu Compatible Models: Chaser, Makutsu (CHASER, MARK 2) Chassis Models: GX90, JZX90, JZX91, JZX93, LX90, SX90 fit year: 1992 / 10-1996 / 09 fit color names: SABLE |
| Notes | Images are for illustration purpose only. Actual product may vary. |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.7 ★★★★★
Based on 18 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 1
Poor quality, easily rips at seams.
Size: Medium, Color: Organic Cotton 5 Black Pack
Fit is great but these things do not hold up. I have some Gap hipsters that are older and they are much higher quality. These rip and tear way too easily.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 15, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Runs small. Get a size up.
Size: Large, Color: Organic Cotton 5 Pack-bwg
Runs a bit small. Kind of tight. Size up.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 26, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Elastic band is not great
Size: X-Large, Color: Organic Cotton 5 Black Pack
The cotton material is comfortable and seems like it will last some time because it isn't thin like most. However, I could really use a thicker, more durable elastic band.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 29, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Comfortable
Size: Large, Color: Organic Cotton 5 Black Pack
Comfortable and decent looking black underwear in a hipster, boy cut style. Material is soft and lightweight, kind of thin, but since they’re black they’re not see through at all. The elastic band at waist is also thin and not too tight so it’s very comfortable and doesn’t dig in at all. Five identical pairs in the order makes this a decent value, especially at this price and for Organic cotton material. The large size was perfect for me I sized up based on the recommendations). I’m pretty happy with this order.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 17, 2024
★★★★★ 5
Comfortable, great coverage, perfect fit!
Size: Medium, Color: Organic Cotton 5 Black Pack
These boy shorts are the perfect cut and extremely comfortable! They were true to size, great coverage and they fit me great. They stay in place and don't ride up in my pants so that was a huge plus too. Really glad these came in a pack of multiples cause I would definitely want more. I actually might order more anyways cause I like them so much, haha! Definitely recommend these, they are a great price for comfortable, nice quality underwear.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 4, 2024