SKU: 54918420180

Sennheiser GZL RG 58 - 0.25m Coaxial Cable with BNC Connector

Sale price$301.19 Regular price$334.65
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $83.66 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 30 - Aug 4

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Sennheiser GZL RG 58 - 0.25m Coaxial Cable with BNC ConnectorSennheiser GZL RG 58 0. 25m Coaxial Cable The Sennheiser GZL RG 58 0. 25m (Article Number: 700158) is a professional grade, 50 Ohm radio frequency (RF) coaxial antenna cable assembly. Measuring exactly 25 centimeters (9. 84 inches) in length, this ultra short interconnect is engineered specifically for stacking hardware modules directly on top of each other. It is the primary jumping cable used to hook up high density wireless systems, such as

Sennheiser GZL RG 58 - 0.25m Coaxial Cable

The Sennheiser GZL RG 58 - 0.25m (Article Number: 700158) is a professional-grade, 50-Ohm radio frequency (RF) coaxial antenna cable assembly. Measuring exactly 25 centimeters (9.84 inches) in length, this ultra-short interconnect is engineered specifically for stacking hardware modules directly on top of each other. It is the primary jumping cable used to hook up high-density wireless systems, such as bridging channels on a Sennheiser EW-D ASA antenna splitter or linking stacked evolution wireless receivers within a tight rack environment.

Key RF Signal Architecture

True 50-Ohm Impedance Match: Professional wireless audio networks rely entirely on a uniform 50-Ohm impedance architecture. This ultra-short 0.25-meter cable guarantees a solid 50-Ohm profile from end to end, eliminating localized standing wave reflections and phase mismatches that corrupt signal paths and trigger dropouts.

Absolute Minimum Lead Length: Spanning just 25 cm, this cable is designed to provide the cleanest possible layout behind equipment frames. Keeping the RF line short eliminates internal loops, preventing the cable from acting as an accidental induction antenna for power supplies or nearby digital processors.

Ultra-Low Resistance BNC Connections: Both ends of the cable terminate in heavy-duty, male-to-male BNC connectors. These utilize a standardized twist-and-lock coupling mechanism to safeguard your equipment hooks against mechanical vibration, accidental tugs, or moving rack frames.

Technical Specifications Matrix

Feature Parameter Performance Specification Value
Cable Assembly Model GZL RG 58 - 0.25m
Official Article Number 700158
Total Physical Length 0.25 meters (9.84 inches)
Nominal System Impedance 50 Ohms
Input and Output Connectors BNC Male to BNC Male
Cable Outer Diameter 6.15 mm
Maximum Operating Frequency 1000 MHz (Optimized for UHF blocks)
Cable Capacitance Metric 101 pF/m
Conductor DCR Rating 3.54 Ohms / 100 meters
Operational Temperature Range -40 to 85 degrees Celsius
Outer Shielding Jacket Color Low-reflection Matte Black

RF Signal Loss and Attenuation Metrics

Coaxial lines experience a microscopic amount of signal attenuation over distance. Because this patching segment is kept down to an ultra-tight 0.25 meters, line loss is completely negligible. At a standard 20 degrees Celsius environment, the attenuation curves for this specific 0.25-meter run parse as follows:

Operating Frequency Channel Expected Signal Loss over 0.25 Meters
400 MHz (Lower UHF Segment) Approx. 0.08 dB loss
800 MHz (Upper UHF Segment) Approx. 0.14 dB loss
1000 MHz (Maximum Rating Threshold) Approx. 0.16 dB loss

System Implementation Guidelines

Keep Connections Clean: Because BNC connections operate at very high frequencies, microscopic bits of dust, oil from skin contact, or corrosion inside the barrel can mimic a major signal drop. Keep the internal pin contacts clean. If a rack link has been sitting unused or exposed to outdoor festival dust, blow it clear with compressed air before locking it down.

Protect the Bend Radius: Never pinch, kink, or force this cable into a tight, sharp 90-degree bend to clear a shallow rack lid. Bending the wire too sharply forces the center copper strand out of position relative to the outer foil shield. This localized physical change instantly skews the uniform 50-Ohm impedance shape, creating an RF bottleneck that bounces signal backward and reduces overall reception quality. Use smooth, looping layouts behind your gear.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 54918420180

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 25 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
S
Verified Purchase
SeedyROM
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
Incredible Quality, Incredible Results!!
AMAZING!! I use my Samsung Z Fold with a Maono Podcast Soundboard for podcasting. Having the phone charge from the soundboard power passthrough was inadequate to keep the phone charged, and generated "noise" in the path. I got the Anker 565 USB-C hub, and routed the power and signal through the Anker hub. WOW!! My phone remains fully charged throughout the podcast, there is ZERO "noise" in the signal, and I can actually do more than ever expected! The quality of Anker products has been proven with me Over and Over with every single product I have purchased. From high-end 240w USB-C cords, to Power Banks, Power Blocks, Bluetooth Earbuds & Headphones, across the board; I have never been disappointed! I highly recommend Anker, and specifically the Anker 565 USB-C hub!!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 8, 2025
W
Verified Purchase
Wary one
Los Angeles, US
★★★★★ 5
Versatile with all the ports you’re looking for.
Compact and really expands your options. I was using one of the ports on the MacBook Pro M1 for a second display and the other for an external drive and then switching back and forth with the charger. This device does all that and only uses one of the ports. Plus there are multiple USB OLD STYLE still available. No external power appears to be necessary, although since I use the Mac power supply in the dedicated power in port I’d think there’d be no issue.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 7, 2026
J
Verified Purchase
J. Almeida
Draper, US
★★★★★ 1
Good product, I suspect, if it works. (Also Marketing Needs Improvement)
UPDATE: Nope, it's just the hub. :( It's either defective or not a good product, which is unfortunate. The stutter issue has been resolved, but I can still not use the dock to push an image to my secondary monitor (1080p). I spent several hours this evening updating drivers for my Lenovo Thinkpad E15 Gen2 (AMD) without success. FYI: This laptop DOES support PD+DP through USB-C, something I confirmed before trying to go down the USB-C route in an attempt to replace my ancient Diamond USB-A dock. An image was never sent to my second monitor, whether connected via HDMI or DP through the hub. In all cases, the monitor IS recognized by Windows, so some information is being communicated, just not an image to the monitor. During every attempt, when the monitor was first plugged in, responsiveness in Windows would stutter, lag, and generally respond slowly to my KB+M inputs until, eventually, the laptop caught up and was OK. I am highly disappointed and am considering returning both products, but the USB-C dock is definitely returning. It would be nice, but I don't need a 100W charger. My hope of replacing my current USB-A dock is diminishing at the price point I was hoping for, so we shall see if it's up to the task of the new 2K monitor I have on the way and go from there. Original: Buyer be cautioned: The Anker 565 USB-C also needs power for itself, which is evident if you think about it, but it's not stated anywhere that I could find, and it may not dawn on you until things aren't working quite right. Lack of power could cause many issues I've read about in reviews. The issue: Mouse movement would stutter every 5-10 seconds. Though Windows recognized my HDMI monitor in Device Manager/Display settings, no image was sent to it through the Anker hub. Current theory: So, the manufacturer's 65W USB-C charger for my laptop cannot FULLY power the hub with one connected HDMI monitor, two USBs, and Ethernet through the USB-C hub. I did not test the two USB devices (Keyboard and headset) as there was little need once the stuttering began, which was immediate. I have an Anker Nano 100W arriving tomorrow, and I will update the review once I've re-tested. Suggestion: My ask to Anker would be to *estimate* the power draw of their dock and list it somewhere with many warnings, etc. If they wanted to go above and beyond and add averages for peripherals and the like, that would be amazing, but if not, I would understand, as I'm sure that information could become dated fast. A power warning would have prompted me to consider the power charging situation, and I may gone with one of their docks (About a $100 increase) instead. But now that I'm annoyed, I'll purchase a 100W charger that I can use for my work laptop and elsewhere as needed. :) They are still getting my money, but not as much. They make amazing products, but small details like this matter to me as a consumer.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 26, 2024
I
Verified Purchase
icsttt
Massapequa, US
★★★★★ 5
Anker 11 in 1 Docking station as a Starter.
This is an entry level addition to a PC. If more ports needed then the 14 in 1 or a powered Hub.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 3, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
Theodore Pankiewicz
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 5
It’s worth it
They sick with the insurance they cllaim
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 1, 2026

recommand products