SKU: 5715467501

Nansemond County, Virginia 1810 Substitute Census by John Vogt

Sale price$12.55 Regular price$13.95
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $3.49 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 12 - Aug 17

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Nansemond County, Virginia 1810 Substitute Census by John VogtNansemond's 1810 census was destroyed during the War of 1812, and the abstracted 1815 personal property tax list (earliest available) and the 1810 & 1815 land tax listss offer a substitute census for the head of households. Abstracts from the Personal Property and Land Tax Lists in the Library of Virginia. Nansemond is one of eighteen Virginia counties for which the 1810 census is lost. In August, 1814 British troops occupied Washington, DC and public

Nansemond's 1810 census was destroyed during the War of 1812, and the abstracted 1815 personal property tax list (earliest available) and the 1810 & 1815 land tax listss offer a substitute census for the head of households.

Abstracts from the Personal Property and Land Tax Lists in the Library of Virginia.

Nansemond is one of eighteen Virginia counties for which the 1810 census is lost. In August, 1814 British troops occupied Washington, DC and public buildings were put to the torch. In the destruction that followed, numerous early records of the government were lost, including all of Virginia's 1790 and 1800 census reports, as well as eighteen county lists for the state's most recent [1810] federal census. Although two "fair copies" of each county's census had been left in the counties for public display, these were ephemeral lists and not preserved, and by 1814 they too had been mislaid, lost, or destroyed. Hence, the closest document available we have to reconstruct a partial image of the missing county lists is the personal property tax list.

According to research notes by Minor T. Weisiger, Library of Virginia archivist: "Information recorded in Virginia personal property tax records changed gradually from 1782 to 1865. The early laws required the tax commissioner in each district to record in "a fair alphabetical list" the names of the person chargeable with the tax, the names of white male tithables over the age of twenty-one, the number of white male tithables between ages sixteen and twenty-one, the number of slaves both above and below age sixteen, various types of animals such as horses and cattle, carriage wheels, ordinary licenses, and even billiard tables. Free Negroes are listed by name and often denoted in the list as "free" or "FN."

In previous substitute censuses compiled by this author, the 1810 personal property tax list has been the primary source. In the case of Nansemond, however, the earliest personal property tax list available is that of 1815. The current list is a complete transcription of that document, with the following data present: 1) Number of tithable males over 16; 2) number of slaves over 12; 3) number of horses, mules & asses; & 4) number of cattle. These are in a columnar fashion, followed by a description of any taxable personal property listed by the tax commissioner for each family.

In addition, the compiler has added data from the 1810 & 1815 land tax lists for Nansemond. This information has been printed in italics to distinguish it from the personal property tax list. When taken together, the two tax sources give a good picture of the county and its social structure.

Surnames found in this book:

Abdil; Airs; Allen; Allmand; Allmond; Alphin; Archer; Arnold; Arthur; Ashborne; Ashbourn; Ashbourne; Askew; Aswell;

Babb; Baccle; Bailey; Baines; Bains; Baker; Ballard; Ballentine; Barclay; Barfield; Barklay; Barr; Barrott; Bartlette; Bartley; Bateman; Bates; Bayley; Beal; Beaman; Beasley; Belfour & Barraud; Ben; Benn; Benson; Benton; Best; Bethia; Bevan; Bidgood; Billings; Bird; Boeman; Boggs; Boothe; Bowser; Boyce; Boykin; Boyt; Bradford; Bradley; Branton; Brewer; Briggs; Brinkley; Brothers; Brown; Browne; Bryant; Buk; Bullard; Bullock; Bunton; Burris; Butler; Buxton;

Campbell; Carr; Carrol; Carwick; Cathon; Chapman; Claibourn; Clarke; Cockel; Coffield; Cofields; Cohoon; Cole; Coleman; Collins; Collur; Cook; Cooke; Cooper; Copeland; Corbell; Cowling; Cowper; Cross; Culpeper; Cuningham; Cunningham; Cutchin;

Dailey; Darden; Dashield; Daughtrey; Daughtry; David; Davidson; Davis; Deford; Denby; Denson; Dildy; Dilsburg; Dixon; Dorlon; Dowdy; Draper; Driver; Duck; Duke; Dunford; Dunn;

Ease; Eley; Ellis; Ellison; Elsberry; Eskridge; Everett; Everitt;

Fanning; Farrow; Fatherru; Faulk; Fisher; Fitzhue; Flynn; Fones; Foster; Fowles; Franklin; Frazier; Frost; Fulgham;

Gardner; Gary; Gaskins; Gay; George; Gilcrest; Glovier; Godwin; Gomer; Goodman; Goodwin; Graham; Granberry; Graves; Gray; Grayham; Green; Griffin; Griggs; Guy; Gwin;

Hale; Hall; Hamilton; Hare; Hargrove; Hargroves; Harrel; Harrell; Harrison; Harvey; Hasier; Haslet; Hatton; Hayes; Haywood; Hedgbeth; Hedgebeth; Hefferton; Henderson; Hickinbotham; Hill; Hims; Hines; Hodges; Hoffler; Hofman; Holladay; Holland; Hookey; Hooky; Hornsby; Horton; Howard; Howell; Hudnall; Hulet; Hunter; Hurdle;

James; Jarvis; Jinkins; Johnson; Jones; Jopsey; Jordan; Jucely; Jusley;

Keeling; Keely; Keen; Keen; Kelly; King; Knight;

Langston; Laperouse; Lassiter; Latimer; Lattimer; Laurence; Laycock; Laylor; Lee; Lester; Lewis; Lickie; Lightfoot; Lingo; Lockard; Lockheart; Luke; Lunsford; Luwelling;

Mansfield; March; Marshall; Martin; Marvel; Marvell; Mathews; Matthews; McClenachan; McClenney; McClenny; Meade; Meades; Melony; Meltiare; Mezick; Miars; Miles; Milner; Milron; Minton; Mintz; Moderno; Monk; Moore; Moreland; Morgan; Morris; Mungo; Murdaugh; Murphree; Murphy; Myers;

Nelms; Newton; Norfleet; Norflet;

Odom; Odum; Oliver; Osbourne; Outland; O’Sheals;

Parker; Parkinson; Parnald; Parnel; Parr; Peale; Peck; Perritt; Phelps; Pierce; Pinner; Pitt; Pitts; Pointer; Poole; Pope; Porter; Powell; Prentis; Price; Pritlow; Pruden; Pugh; Pullin; Purdie;

Radwell; Raiby; Randolph; Rawles; Reade; Red; Redman; Richards; Ricks; Riddick; Rix; Rix; Roberts; Robinson; Rodgers; Rogers; Rose; Ross; Rountree; Russell; Rustin;

Saunders; Savage; Scarsbrook; Scott; Shelton; Sheperd; Shepherd; Sheppard; Simons; Sivill; Sketo; Skinner; Slade; Slavin; Small; Smelly; Smith; Sparling; Spencer; Spivey; Stag; Stallings; Staples; Stephens; Stoakley; Stokely; Stokes; Sumner; Swamp; Swepson;

Taylor; Teare; Thomas; Thompson; Timmons; Townes; Trotter; Turlington;

Underwood;

Vardiman; Vasser; Vaughan; Vaughn; Velims; Vernelson; Very; Vesey;

Wainwright; Wakefield; Walker; Wards; Warren; Waters; Weatherly; Webb; Whitfield; Whitley; Whitlock; Wiggins; Wilder; Wilder; Wilkins; Wilkinson; Williams; Willis; Wills; Wilson; Winbourne; Wise; Wisharts; Woodsides; Woodward; Woolford; Wright;

Yarbrough

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 5715467501

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 7 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
Verified Purchase
Anthony C.
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
Penny loafers - best new old style
Size: 10, Color: Burgundy Polished Full Grain
These fit great. Real old school style reborn as original. Comfortable leather and looks great with jeans or dress pants.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 25, 2025
T
Verified Purchase
Tisch Thompson
Birmingham, US
★★★★★ 5
Good quality for a great price
Material Type: Recycled Polyester, Color: Cobalt Blue, Size: Large
Love this fleece, warm, soft, great quality and I love the front pocket to keep hands warm and store stuff You need handy without falling out!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 6, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
Stane
Port Orchard, US
★★★★★ 5
Warm, Comfortable, and Great Value!!
Material Type: Recycled Polyester, Color: Black Red Buffalo Check, Size: Medium
This fleece is cozy and does a good job keeping warm in cold weather. The material is soft, the fit is comfortable, and it layers well over a shirt. Not heavy-duty outerwear, but perfect for everyday wear and great quality for the price.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 17, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
S. Chung
Alexandria, US
★★★★★ 4
Thick and Warm, but not too comfy
Material Type: Recycled Polyester, Color: Light Grey Heather, Size: Medium
These are great pullover 1/4 zip fleece sweaters. They are relatively thick and very warm, about twice as thick and stiff as the common Columbia fleece pullover. The fleece is very dense, almost like a jacket. Pros: - Quite thick and warm, almost too warm - Good fitting cut (doesn't bulge in the wrong places) - Good value for the price - Lots of different color choices Cons - Quite thick - a bit stiff and not very stretchy (not great to sleep in, can be hard to put on or take off) - It has a seam running down the middle of the back. It doesn't bother me, but it would be better if it had no seam there. Overall recommended if you're looking for a thick/warm fleece sweater of decent quality, without spending much money.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 16, 2025
J
Verified Purchase
Jim Pierce
Phoenix, US
★★★★★ 5
Awesome.
Material Type: Recycled Polyester, Color: Light Grey Heather, Size: X-Large
Fleece jacket is nothing short of awesome. I picked up a few over the years and always been pleased with them. Worn to work, for casual wear, And now that i'm retired just around the house to keep warm. They wear well, Wash well, Hold their shape stitching and zippers. Watching their price I scored this win for twelve dollars and sixty cents. They lend themselves well to layering as well. A real value in this day and age. Very true to size very comfortable.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 5, 2026

recommand products