Pay in installments of $71.58 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Aug 10 - Aug 15
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
24032 be xl c3 fagTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: FAG Synonym: 0590199210030 24032 BE C3 ueres Breitenma: 80 mm Gewicht: 12468 Gramm Herstellungsland: Deutschland Innendurchmesser: 160 mm Zolltarifnummer: 8482 3000 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae: mm 240,00 BE Maximum Capacity Design Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "2550. 0000" ueres Breitenmae: mm 80,00 ueres Breitenmae: mm 80,00 C3 Internal Clearance Larger Than Normal ECLASS number 23 05 09 11 ECLASS2
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: FAG |
| Synonym: 0590199210030 24032-BE-C3 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: 80 mm |
| Gewicht: 12468 Gramm |
| Herstellungsland: Deutschland |
| Innendurchmesser: 160 mm |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 3000 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 240,00 |
| BE Maximum Capacity Design |
| Begrenzungsdrehzahl (n G) "2550.0000" |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 80,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 80,00 |
| C3 Internal Clearance Larger Than Normal |
| ECLASS number 23-05-09-11 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-09-11 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 12.3 |
| Innenmaße: mm 160,00 |
| Interne Radialluft C3 Innenluft (größer als Cn) |
| Radial Dynamic Load Rating Cr (N) 770000 |
| Radial Static Load Rating C0r (N) 1240000 |
| Referenzdrehzahl (n ϑr) "1660.0000" |
| Schwingsiebausführung Keine Schwingsiebausführung |
| XL X-Life |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 5 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Yummy and more healthy option for candy.
Flavor Name: Chocolate Caramel, Size: 5 Ounces
We absolutely love these and I love that they aren’t that bad for my kids!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 14, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Tasty!
Flavor Name: Chocolate Caramel, Size: 5 Ounces
I didn’t miss the sugar at all. Can’t even tell that it’s sugar-free. The taste and texture are just like sugary caramels.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 9, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Really good, but watch that sugar alcohol!
Flavor Name: Chocolate Caramel, Size: 5 Ounces
When you are limited by your sugar content, you search for anything that tastes better than cardboard!!
I’ve tried MANY different foods and treats. When you purchase something like a sugar free gummy bear you find out too late that the supposed gummy is actually hard and nothing like eating a squishy gummy. So I kept looking and found there chocolate caramels. Believe it or not, that they are really good. But like all things in life there are always positives and negatives. I’ve already told you that they have a great taste, so here come the negatives:
Somewhat expensive for such a small package.
VERY chewy. You have to be careful because when you chew this it gets somewhat thick residue all over your mouth. It’s exactly like chewing taffy where it becomes soft and somewhat pliable all over your mouth. Is this really bad? No, but it you have any dental problems or loose teeth, this not for you.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 8, 2024
★★★★★ 1
Sugar free treats
Flavor Name: Chocolate Caramel, Size: 5 Ounces
Kids didn’t like the taste of these.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on August 22, 2025
★★★★★ 3
Too hard
Flavor Name: Chocolate Caramel, Size: 5 Ounces
The taste of the chocolate caramels was good but they werent as soft as I'd hoped. I will buy another bag to see if it was a fluke that they were harder than I'd hoped.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 23, 2026