SKU: 21801667323

Yukon Gear Dana 44 High Performance Ring & Pinion Gear Set Replacement

Sale price$212.40 Regular price$236.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $59.00 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 18 - Jul 23

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Yukon Gear Dana 44 High Performance Ring & Pinion Gear Set ReplacementYukon Gear & Axle high performance ring & pinions set the standard for quality. Yukon Engineers use state of the art design & testing processes, backed by 2 in house quality labs to ensure each item manufactured meets exacting specifications & quality standards. Yukon designed gear tooth surface finish reduces both friction & heat for long races & high torque conditions. We use high grade steel in both the ring & pinion, with fitment designed to OEM

Yukon Gear & Axle high performance ring & pinions set the standard for quality. Yukon Engineers use state-of-the art design & testing processes, backed by 2 in-house quality labs to ensure each item manufactured meets exacting specifications & quality standards. Yukon designed gear tooth surface finish reduces both friction & heat for long races & high torque conditions. We use high grade steel in both the ring & pinion, with fitment designed to OEM specs. Go ahead, add loads of horsepower & go big on tires because Yukon offers the widest selection of gear ratios to choose from. You?ll know that your gear choice was the right one, because you chose Yukon. Yukon Ring & Pinions come with a 1 year warranty against manufacture defects. Yukon offers a Y.E.S. Plan for a lifetime, comprehensive, no-questions-asked protection plan covering your gears for as long as you own the vehicle.

This Part Fits:

Year Make Model Submodel
1969-1974 Chevrolet Blazer Base
1967-1968 Chevrolet C10 Pickup Base
1993-1994 Chevrolet Camaro Base
1984-1985 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta
1993 Chevrolet Camaro Indianapolis 500 Pace Car
1985 Chevrolet Camaro Iroc-Z
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS
1992 Chevrolet Camaro RS Heritage Edition
1984-1985 Chevrolet Camaro Sport
1984-1985,1992-1994 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
1992 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 Heritage Edition
1967,1969-1972 Chevrolet G10 Van Base
1968-1972 Chevrolet G10 Van Sportvan
1975-1980 Chevrolet K10 Cheyenne
1975-1980 Chevrolet K10 Custom Deluxe
1975-1980 Chevrolet K10 Scottsdale
1975-1980 Chevrolet K10 Silverado
1960-1974 Chevrolet K10 Pickup Base
1967-1974 Chevrolet K10 Suburban Base
1975-1980 Chevrolet K10 Suburban Custom Deluxe
1975-1980 Chevrolet K10 Suburban Scottsdale
1975-1977,1979-1980 Chevrolet K10 Suburban Silverado
1975-1980 Chevrolet K20 Cheyenne
1975-1980 Chevrolet K20 Custom Deluxe
1975-1980 Chevrolet K20 Scottsdale
1975-1980 Chevrolet K20 Silverado
1962-1974 Chevrolet K20 Pickup Base
1967-1974 Chevrolet K20 Suburban Base
1975-1980 Chevrolet K20 Suburban Custom Deluxe
1975-1980 Chevrolet K20 Suburban Scottsdale
1975-1977,1979-1980 Chevrolet K20 Suburban Silverado
1977-1980 Chevrolet K30 Cheyenne
1977-1980 Chevrolet K30 Custom Deluxe
1977-1980 Chevrolet K30 Scottsdale
1977-1980 Chevrolet K30 Silverado
1968-1974 Chevrolet K30 Pickup Base
1976 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Base
1975-1980 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Cheyenne
1975,1977-1980 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Custom Deluxe
1978,1980 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Silverado
1960-1966 Chevrolet Suburban Base
1994-1996 Dodge Ram 1500 Base
1997-2001 Dodge Ram 1500 Laramie
1997 Dodge Ram 1500 LT
2001 Dodge Ram 1500 SLT
1997-2001 Dodge Ram 1500 Sport
1997-2001 Dodge Ram 1500 ST
1994-2002 Dodge Ram 2500 Base
1974-1993 Dodge Ramcharger Base
1991-1993 Dodge Ramcharger Canyon Sport
1981-1993 Dodge Ramcharger Royal SE
1975-1980 Dodge Ramcharger SE
1975-1977,1984-1989 Dodge W100 Custom
1968-1974 Dodge W100 Pickup Base
1960-1967 Dodge W100 Series Base
1977-1993 Dodge W150 Base
1990-1991 Dodge W150 S
1975-1980 Dodge W200 Base
1968-1974 Dodge W200 Pickup Base
1960-1967 Dodge W200 Series Base
1981-1993 Dodge W250 Base
1971-1974 Ford Bronco Base
1975-1977 Ford Bronco Custom
1975 Ford Bronco Northland
1975 Ford Bronco Ranger
1975-1977 Ford Bronco Sport
1971-1973 Ford Bronco Wagon
1969-1975 Ford E-100 Econoline Base
1975 Ford E-100 Econoline Chateau
1969-1974 Ford E-100 Econoline Club Wagon
1975 Ford E-100 Econoline Custom
1975 Ford E-100 Econoline Northland
1975-1979 Ford E-150 Econoline Base
1975-1979 Ford E-150 Econoline Chateau
1975-1979 Ford E-150 Econoline Custom
1975-1978 Ford E-150 Econoline Northland
1953-1974,1976-1978 Ford F-100 Base
1975-1979 Ford F-100 Custom
1975-1978 Ford F-100 Northland
1975-1979 Ford F-100 Ranger
1978-1979 Ford F-100 Ranger Lariat
1975-1979 Ford F-100 Ranger XLT
1977 Ford F-100 XLT
1976-1978 Ford F-150 Base
1975-1978 Ford F-150 Custom
1975-1978 Ford F-150 Northland
1975-1978 Ford F-150 Ranger
1978 Ford F-150 Ranger Lariat
1975-1978 Ford F-150 Ranger XLT
1977 Ford F-150 XLT
1959-1974,1976-1977 Ford F-250 Base
1975-1977 Ford F-250 Custom
1975-1977 Ford F-250 Northland
1975-1977 Ford F-250 Ranger
1975-1977 Ford F-250 Ranger XLT
1977 Ford F-250 XLT
1967-1968 GMC C15/C1500 Pickup Base
1967,1970-1971 GMC G15/G1500 Van Base
1968-1969,1971-1972 GMC G15/G1500 Van Rally
1968-1972 GMC G15/G1500 Van Vandura
1964-1966 GMC G1500 Base
1975-1978 GMC K15 Base
1975-1978 GMC K15 High Sierra
1977 GMC K15 Indy Hauler
1975-1978 GMC K15 Sierra Classic
1975-1978 GMC K15 Sierra Grande
1975-1978 GMC K15 Suburban Base
1975-1978 GMC K15 Suburban High Sierra
1975-1978 GMC K15 Suburban Sierra Classic
1975-1978 GMC K15 Suburban Sierra Grande
1966-1974 GMC K15/K1500 Pickup Base
1967-1974 GMC K15/K1500 Suburban Base
1979-1980 GMC K1500 Base
1979-1980 GMC K1500 High Sierra
1979-1980 GMC K1500 Sierra Classic
1979-1980 GMC K1500 Sierra Grande
1979-1980 GMC K1500 Suburban Base
1979-1980 GMC K1500 Suburban High Sierra
1979-1980 GMC K1500 Suburban Sierra Classic
1979-1980 GMC K1500 Suburban Sierra Grande
1975-1978 GMC K25 Base
1975-1978 GMC K25 High Sierra
1975-1978 GMC K25 Sierra Classic
1975-1978 GMC K25 Sierra Grande
1975-1978 GMC K25 Suburban Base
1975-1978 GMC K25 Suburban High Sierra
1975-1978 GMC K25 Suburban Sierra Classic
1975-1978 GMC K25 Suburban Sierra Grande
1967-1974 GMC K25/K2500 Pickup Base
1967-1974 GMC K25/K2500 Suburban Base
1979-1980 GMC K2500 Base
1979-1980 GMC K2500 High Sierra
1979-1980 GMC K2500 Sierra Classic
1979-1980 GMC K2500 Sierra Grande
1979-1980 GMC K2500 Suburban Base
1979-1980 GMC K2500 Suburban High Sierra
1979-1980 GMC K2500 Suburban Sierra Classic
1979-1980 GMC K2500 Suburban Sierra Grande
1960-1966 GMC Suburban Base
1968-1971 International Scout Base
1971-1974,1976-1980 International Scout II Base
1978-1979 International Scout II SS2
1976-1980 International Scout II Terra
1976-1980 International Scout II Traveler
1975 International Scout II XLC
1993-1997 Isuzu Rodeo LS
1993-1997 Isuzu Rodeo S
1986-1993 Jeep Cherokee Base
1991-1992 Jeep Cherokee Briarwood
1986-1988 Jeep Cherokee Chief
1993 Jeep Cherokee Country
1986-1992 Jeep Cherokee Laredo
1987-1992 Jeep Cherokee Limited
1986-1990 Jeep Cherokee Pioneer
1989-1993 Jeep Cherokee Sport
1960-1983 Jeep CJ5 Base
1977-1980 Jeep CJ5 Golden Eagle
1980-1983 Jeep CJ5 Laredo
1982-1983 Jeep CJ5 Limited
1975-1983 Jeep CJ5 Renegade
1966-1975 Jeep CJ6 Base
1986 Jeep CJ7 Base
1986 Jeep CJ7 Laredo
1986 Jeep CJ7 Renegade
1987-1992 Jeep Comanche Base
1987-1988 Jeep Comanche Chief
1986 Jeep Comanche Custom
1990-1992 Jeep Comanche Eliminator
1987-1988 Jeep Comanche Laredo
1987-1992 Jeep Comanche Pioneer
1986 Jeep Comanche X
1986 Jeep Comanche XLS
1966-1973 Jeep Commando Base
1984-1991,1993 Jeep Grand Wagoneer Base
1984-1985 Jeep Grand Wagoneer Limited
1974-1988 Jeep J10 Base
1981-1986 Jeep Scrambler Base
1985-1986 Jeep Scrambler Laredo
1985-1986 Jeep Scrambler Renegade
1982-1983 Jeep Scrambler SL
1982-1984 Jeep Scrambler SR
1971-1982,1984-1987 Jeep Wagoneer Base
1982-1983 Jeep Wagoneer Brougham
1973-1976 Jeep Wagoneer Custom
1979-1990 Jeep Wagoneer Limited
2006 Jeep Wrangler 65th Anniversary Edition
2003-2006 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon
1997-2004 Jeep Wrangler Sahara
1997-2006 Jeep Wrangler SE
1997-2006 Jeep Wrangler Sport
2004-2006 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited
2005-2006 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon
2002-2006 Jeep Wrangler X
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 21801667323

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 24 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
C
Verified Purchase
Craig Matteson
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 5
This wonderful biography focuses on what the contemporary records actually tell us.
Format: Paperback
I am very grateful to Richard Bushman for this book. Writing about Joseph Smith invites a storm of criticism because skeptics only want him debunked and believers want their faith supported. Each wants their pre-conceived image of who Joseph was to be proven correct. Bushman takes a strong stance that lets the evidence we have speak for itself, preferably as close to Joseph himself and contemporary witnesses as possible, and tell the story of his life to high scholarly standards. For me the book read somewhat sparer than a biography that includes anecdotes as if they are history. Many familiar stories that I learned growing up are simply not here. However, relying as much as possible on contemporary accounts and what Joseph himself wrote or said provides a a biography more consistent in its view of Joseph than the books that either extol him or those that tend to attack him and try to debunk him. For example, the famous Brodie biography seemed to me to want Joseph to be both a genius and a dolt, a highly energetic man yet lazy, a crazed believer and a cynical con man, and on and on with similar contradictions. Bushman achieves a more consistent lens on Joseph, despite the complications of the man and his life. I think this is both a great achievement and a real help in trying to understand Joseph. I mean it as high praise for the book when I say that I think that almost everyone who reads this book thoughtfully will take away a broader and deeper conception of who Joseph Smith was and what he did. Rather than try to recount the book to you I want to share several things that I learned from the book and really value. I could list dozens more, but you can read the book for yourself (which I encourage you to do). Yes, I am a believing member of the LDS Church, but I think the book is intelligent and honest and complete enough to provide interesting and thought provoking material for both the believer and the skeptic and for someone who comes with no knowledge of Joseph at all. Believers will have to consider the complications of the man and his flesh and blood temperament and the misjudgments he made in his life about the people he trusted and some of the actions he took. Skeptics will have to deal with the reality of the man and his achievements. Simply dismissing him as a con man or a crazed visionary will not work because that is not what the actual evidence says. Joseph did not run the Church as the single central figure nor did he turn it into a cult of Joseph Smith. Bushman showed me the power and genius of the organization of the Church and its balancing mechanisms of being flat with a broadly held male priesthood with a hierarchical leadership with doctrine of keys and how the later addition of women in the operation, governing of the Church, and caring of the needs of the Saints strengthened and enriched it. And while Joseph was the President of the Church and its Prophet and Seer he really did let local leadership govern itself according to the principles taught through the revelations. I think Bushman's focus on the development of the organization and its role in preserving the Church and its ongoing growth after Joseph's murder is spot on and helped deepen my appreciation of its dynamism and adaptability. I also like the compromise language Bushman achieved in dealing with the realities of the revelations of Joseph Smith. The author always refers to them as Joseph's revelations. For believers, we accept them as revelations from God through Joseph Smith, but I can see them as "Joseph's" in that they were given through him. And skeptics who reject anything divine about the revelations can accept that, whatever they are, Joseph spoke them. I also liked learning how many of the revelations were given in the presence of others in meetings, how matter of fact they were, how they were immediately copied and circulated, and how difficult it was to get them collected and printed for a variety of reasons until we finally got them published as the Doctrine and Covenants. Another thing I gained a deeper appreciation of was the utter daring and the monumental nature of building the Kirtland Temple so early in the Church's life. Most Mormon congregations (wards) have around 500 members. Kirtland at the time they were building the temple was growing, but only had around 600 members when the project began. I can't fathom taking on such a project with so few people and for a people living in log structures and less it is even more incredible. Yet they built it in that rugged frontier town. I also thought that Bushman handled the sense of the miraculous around the dedication of the temple very sensitively. I also did not realize that when Joseph and Oliver were receiving the visitation of the Savior, Moses, Elijah, and Elias on the altar of the temple that up to 1,000 members were in the temple on the other side of the curtain. When I was growing up I did not understand clearly how early the Saints arrived in Missouri and how much larger the settlement there was than in Kirtland even though the temple in Kirtland was built and the proposed temple for Zion was not. Bushman also does a good job of giving a clear picture of the dynamics of the persecutions in Missouri and how the growing political power and anti-slavery stance of the Mormons antagonized the locals. The so-called Mormon War is also more critical to the rest of Joseph's life than I had realized. The constant hounding from Missouri and Joseph having to fear for his life from then on was something I had not truly appreciated. I also think Bushman handles the issue of plural marriage as well as it can be handled. And I think I gained a deeper understanding of John C. Bennett's role in the persecution of the Mormons in Illinois than I had before. I think the actual martyrdom is given a little too light a treatment here, but it is well covered material, and as Bushman notes, a great deal of faith promoting stories have accumulated around that event over the years. And I think he was probably wise in not opening up his book to attacks because he debunked someone's favorite story about Joseph's last days. Just laying out what is actually documented from the time is very helpful. Even with all the praise I have given, I could heap a great deal more if I had the space and time. But I do want to share an honest perspective I have of the book. It is superior, truly marvelous, from Joseph's early life through the dedication of the Kirtland Temple. That is the zenith of the book. From that point on, while good, the author himself cites difficulty in getting to Joseph directly after that point because his life and the nature of the work of the Church and the lives of the Saints changed. The rest of the book is not as exquisite. Very good, interesting, and informative, but not quite equal to the previous material. It becomes more of a narrative than it had been probably for the reason Bushman cites. I did find the footnotes and bibliography quite useful. They enriched my reading and sent me on to other reading I found illuminating and will help me in selecting other directions for study for years to come. So, I am especially thankful for the hard work in putting all that material together, as well. This is a monumental work and a treasure. Read it. Evaluate it for yourself no matter your present attitude or judgments of Joseph Smith. You will have a more considered and informed view for having read it. And, I don't know why this is in the paperback section. I bought and read the hardcover of the book. Reviewed by Craig Matteson, Saline, MI
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 15, 2012
R
Verified Purchase
R. Mckissick
Waukegan, US
★★★★★ 5
Candid Honesty from a great American Historian
Format: Hardcover
Reading Puritans to Yankees, a Bancroft Prize history, I moved to this tome. Professor(full) Bushman is a great American historian. This book follows tradition. One look at Prof. Bushman's on-line student sylabuses or awards at Columbia illustrates his leadership ofhistory students. Years I've spent trying to better understand ancient Pauls revelations; in particular the one with Christ on the road. How can one get closer to Christ without understanding revelation? At the third read of Rough Stone, and lots of redlines, I think this book is about revelation. Also what a rare thing revelation has been; heaven is open modernly for revelation. I wish I could understand the Bible without a guide to communicaton form God. Rough Stone has opened a new understanding of revelation. Maybe the most important thing is that God is all powerful and supreem, and will talk to us when He wants and we are able to understand. Bushman's honest facts include the unknown. Cited notes and end references indicate ratio of 20 to 1, focusing on issues not defense. His knowledge quest is aparent, like an intelligent friend who relates and lays out the reasons for his analysis. The evidence historians rely on, shows that Smith himself spoke and acted consistently with God. All true history I have read has good and bad - same here - the voice is one of personal knowledge. Whether or not you accept Bushman's conclusions on various issues, it is clear that Bushman himself has come historically to his conclusions. Very powerfull statement for an eminent historian. Dissecting a paragraph on prayer, washings and annointings leading up to the 1836 Kirtland Temple dedication is illustrative. After a summary, each person involved is organized into groups (priests, bishops presidents etc.). Concise background connects mental states. Bushman conveys the visions and revelations. Each hammered paragraph a razor sharp sword of truth, accompanied by the Spirit of Christ. May I someday write like this. This book does not attempt reader placement in contextual cultural affinity. The 1840's Latter-day Saints were persecuted, we are not. The Holocost Jews, read pogrom, are culturally atuned, and able to sympathize, we are not. Conveying instructions on getting revelation to unsympathetic readers like us was a challenge beyond comprehenson; study brings some understanding. Bushman has become sympathetic. His out-of-book descriptions of Lincoln defending on the Illinois circuit court clearly depict Bushmans cultural affinity. After three reads, I am becomming sympathetic. My wife calls me a bit crazy with the the 10 mile walks to Church, and baking bread from hand ground wheat, and almost loosing my job from sticking up for "no discussions of dating activities by the student interns at work". A good book should motivate action - maybe I should be less motivated (so she says). The highest recommendation, this is what I would give this book. I A guide to me, it sits with Bushmans other books and essays. I seem better able to understand conference talks. I listened to N. Eldon Tanners talk on Christ from the 147th conference (1982). He went over the first vision. But it became clear Tanner was talking from personal revelation, relating the 1832 description of Joseph Smith. Characteristics of revelation I learned reading Bushmans book jumped out at me during Tanners' talk.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 3, 2011
R
Verified Purchase
R. C. Harris Jr.
West Palm Beach, US
★★★★★ 5
"Clearly the definitive biogrophy for generations to come."
Format: Hardcover
I have read many books about Joseph Smith the prophet, but none have been so informative and balanced as this one. Some of what makes this so brilliant is the autor's choice to include as much information as possible - regardless of it's implications. Richard L. Bushman does not shy away from the controversial, presenting Joseph as somebody who I can finally relate to as a human being, rather than some kind of perfect "way up there" godlike being that Primary and Sunday School (intentionally or not) portray him. It was a relief for me to read of Joseph's mistakes in addition to his many amazing accomoplishments as a prophet, mayor, general, presidential candidate and much more. I love how honest Brother Bushman is in the book's preface: "A believing historian like myself cannot [...] pretend nothing personal is at stake. For a character as controversial as Smith, pure objectivity is impossible. What I can do is to look frankly at all the sides of Joseph Smith, facing up to his mistakes and flaws. Covering up errors makes no sense in any case. Most readers do not believe in, nor are they interested in, perfection. We want to meet a real person." Brother Bushman has "undertaken to explore a side of Joseph Smith not adequately examined in other biogrophies: his religious thought." Thus, we are able to peer into the mind and thoughts of the prophet - to a degree never before accomplished. What motivated him to make the choices he made? Why did he sometimes seem to "lie" in regards to poligamy, the danites, his political motivations, etc? Why was he so "secretive" of his past, the BOM translation, his early visions, etc? All of these and other questions are addressed and we are given a deeper understanding by peering into the mind and "religious thought" of the prophet. For those wondering how much of Brother Bushman's previous work 'Joseph Smith and the beginnings of Mormonism' is contained in this work, he answers that in the preface: "Large portions of chapters 1, 2, 3 and 5" are recycled in this book. I can't praise this book enough. I loved it so much that I bought a second copy to loan out to friends from church. (Yes, I am an active LDS.) I also bought a copy for my Dad for Christmas. I highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in a true and balanced history of Joseph Smith, the prophet. It is true that it shows "negative" sides to the prophet, but these are all very well documented and could not be ignored. I for one appreciate the inclusion of all the facts, not just the ones that place Joseph in a good light. It is as historian Terry L. Givens states on the back cover: "Clearly the definitive biogrophy for generations to come. The most balanced, thorough, and insightful treatment to date--truly a masterful work."
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 28, 2005
A
Verified Purchase
Amazon Customer
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 4
Good material for seminary class or testimony meeting, questionable history and biography
Format: Hardcover
Bushman' preface tells us that this "biography" is a "believers" perspective on Joseph Smith's life and time. Thus, Bushman's book is valuable as insight into how devout, believing, practicing Mormons view Joseph's life. To me, as a "gentile", the book seems like great material for a seminary class or a testimony meeting. The basic Mormon "testimony" statement goes something like "I have a testimony of the truth of the Book of Mormon and that Joseph Smith is a prophet of God." I also imagine that this book might be good material for missionary training. But I have some problems with the historical scholarship. (See the end of my review.) Regardless of my problems with Bushman's text, Joseph Smith is an interesting and complicated character. He has had a lasting impact, and fathered a religion that has members around the world. His life, as well as the religion and church he founded, is well worth studying. But then the same could be said of Ellen White, L. Ron Hubbard, Mary Baker Eddy, and many others. Bushman does give us a valuable, well written (but at times tedious), insight into a believer's perspective on Joseph. But the value of this book as history and biography is problematic. When the historical evidence suggests conflicting interpretations, or negative interpretations, of Joseph, and exposes some of the "rough edges", Bushman never deviates from his testimony that Joseph Smith is a prophet of God. Consequently Bushman always seems to be able to smooth the edges of this "rough stone rolling". In doing so there are some misrepresentations and omissions which diminish the value of this book as a serious study of Joseph's life and times. Bushman has solved the biography problem for believing Mormons who have waited over 60 years for an alternative, and antidote, to Fawn Brodie's "No one Knows my History". But I don't think he has transcended Brodie's work. If you are not a believing Mormon, a better introduction to Joseph Smith would be Robert Remini's short biography (182 pages), "Joseph Smith". Then tackle Bushman's tome (561 pages of text). Problems with Bushmans text: 1. Bushman, as Mormon historians and General Authorities have done for over 100 years, misrepresents and distorts the perspective of Josiah Quincy. A century ago B. H. Roberts claimed that Quincy was "on our side". In the prologue (pp. 1-7), Bushman represents Quincy as a benign "puzzled skeptic". In fact Quincy saw Joseph and his religious movement as an "evil fanaticism" and likens Joseph to Thomas Muntzer (Mulhausen) and Jan van Leydon (Munster). This is clearly stated in the opening paragraph of Quincy's essay, along with comments about "demoralizing doctrines", "still darker revelations", and the assertion that Joseph's religion is "subversive of every duty which we claim from the citizen". ( For the significance of the references to Mulhausen and Munster see Norman Cohn, The Pursuit of the Millennium, pp. 234-280 and Anthony Arthur, The Tailor-King). My concern is not with the merits of Quincy's essay. (You can read Quincy for yourself at [...]) Rather it is that Bushman's representation of Quincy as a benign "puzzled skeptic" is at best inaccurate. Quincy's puzzlement is of a very different nature than Bushman would have us believe. I think Quincy's statements might be closer to what Bushman call the "anti-Mormon argument" (p. 510). But Quincy's personal position on Joseph and his followers would be closer to Thomas Gregg's (p. 532). There are three other misrepresentations of Quincy. Towards the end of the book, Bushman quotes Quincy as saying the Nauvoo temple architecture is "odd and striking"(p. 504). But Quincy also said the temple was "grotesque"! In short he was not favorably impressed. On page 522 Bushman says "Quincy was surprised to hear Joseph invite a Methodist to preach from a Mormon pulpit." In Quincy's text the Methodist minister was clearly surprised at the invitation. But Quincy does not reveal his reaction to this invitation. Given Quincy's descriptions of the banter between Joseph and the minister, I think it would be more appropriate to say Quincy was at best amused. On page 560 Bushman says "Quincy saw in him `that kingly faculty that directs, as by intrinsic light." Bushman puts a period at the end of this quote when there should have been an ellipsis. The sentence concludes "the feeble or confused souls who are looking for guidance." Why did Bushman suggest that the sentence ended at "intrinsic light"? What was Quincy trying to say by this remark? Quincy clearly recognized Joseph as a natural and charismatic leader. While Quincy acknowledged Joseph's leadership strengths, this apparent compliment has to be tempered by the reference to "feeble or confused souls"? Also consider the Mulhausen and Munster references. I don't think that Quincy was in awe of Joseph, or impressed with Joseph in a positive way. Yet in the paragraph that contains this quote, Bushman is expressing his own sense of awe and marvel at Joseph's life and accomplishments. Bushman is entitled to his view of Joseph. But I don't think he is entitled to suggest that Quincy shared his view. 2. Bushman's discussion of the "View of the Hebrews" as a source for Joseph's writing the Book of Mormon (p. 96), fails to cite B. H. Roberts' extended essay documenting similarities between the two books. My concern is not with the merits of Roberts essay. The problem is that Bushman completely ignores Roberts essay in discussing this topic, as well as Roberts essay on archeological evidence for the Book of Mormon. (p. 92) (Roberts essays are published by Signature Books: "Studies of the Book of Mormon", 1985, [...]) I could cite more problems but I would greatly exceed what I think is the appropriate length for an Amazon review.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 26, 2006
S
Verified Purchase
Scooter Reviews
Lexington, US
★★★★★ 5
Like a freight train coming through...
Format: Paperback
I skimmed through a friend's paperback version and quickly realized that this book would require much more careful reading and study. I bought the Kindle version and spent 2 months carefully going through it. I honestly do not know how I missed this book when it came out and I'm embarrassed that it took me 7 years to find it. Like most LDS readers and reviewers here, this completely different approach to the Prophet's history throws you off while at the same time sucking you in. What's amazing to me is the way that Bushman tackles head-on the "problems" and "difficulties" with LDS history. As my title suggests, Bushman is like a freight train coming through Church history and it is a very welcome middle ground to both the Church version and the anti-Mormon version. As someone who has studied this stuff extensively, there was so much new for me in the book. For example, although I knew about the Zions Camp March, I never had actually learned that the whole expedition was an attempt to take back Jackson County lands by military means. Also present in the book are things that I've wondered but never been able to ask, such as all the different aspects of Joseph's practice of polygamy- including lying to Emma, sex with multiple wives, and marrying women who were already married. Bushman is unflinching and I feel this approach is vital for the internet age. As the "Joseph Smith Papers" continue to get published giving writers the good sources materials, I expect more of this open kind of historical inquiry to be written. Joseph's bad temper, his trusting of untrustworthy people, and his mismanagement of multiple situations need to be studied alongside his incredible accomplishments and daring. I agree with Bushman, who quotes Yale scholar Harold Bloom, that the King Follet discourse is one of the best sermons ever delivered in America. Bushman has a whole section dedicated to this one discourse, the climax of Joseph's theology and given at a time when so many things were going wrong for Joseph. I also agree with Bushman that it is a mystery why the King Follet discourse has not been canonized by the Church since it is equal to or superior to many of the revelations currently in the Doctrine & Covenants. Fantastic book and I would give it more stars if I could. The only drawback for me was that Bushman starts by describing Joseph's grandparents and parents before he gets to Joseph and this part bored me a little, but is important for putting Joseph in his historical context. Bushman's scholarly credentials are top-notch and LDS readers will be surprised at how the depth of Bushman's understanding of American history gives more meaning to early LDS church history. Although a patriarch and devout LDS member, Bushman is also one of the preeminent scholars of American history and it comes through in the book. I can see this being a huge benefit to non-Mormon readers who want to approach Joseph from a historical perspective than a believers' perspective. If you like this, I highly recommend you also read the author's "On the Road with Joseph Smith" which is a diary of Bushman's experiences with the book before and after it's release. Also, read Terryl Given's books starting with "By the Hand of Mormon".
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 18, 2012

recommand products