SKU: 8019119057

Gluck, Christoph Willibald: Four Dances from Don Juan (AE169)

Sale price$25.20 Regular price$28.00
Save 10%

Pay in installments of $7.00 with ShopPay, AfterPay and Klarna

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 30 - Aug 4

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Gluck, Christoph Willibald: Four Dances from Don Juan (AE169)Description Gluck, Christoph Willibald (1714 1787) Product Code: AE169 Description: Four Dances from Don Juan Edited by: Cliff Eisen Year of Publication: 1997 Instrumentation: 2ob 2cor fag 2vn va b Binding: Score: Spiral Parts: Unbound Duration: Various ISBN: 1 877171 69 7 Details Leopold Mozart also copied our four dances from Gluck's ballet Don Juan (Vienna, 1761). His autograph score, now in the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek,Munich (Mus. mss. 7859),

Description

Gluck, Christoph Willibald (1714-1787)

Product Code: AE169
Description: Four Dances from Don Juan
Edited by: Cliff Eisen
Year of Publication: 1997
Instrumentation: 2ob 2cor fag 2vn va b
Binding: Score: Spiral / Parts: Unbound
Duration: Various
ISBN: 1-877171-69-7

Details

Leopold Mozart also copied our four dances from Gluck's ballet Don Juan (Vienna, 1761). His autograph score, now in the Bayerische Staatsbibliothek,Munich (Mus.mss. 7859), is written on a single bifolium, with the dances in the following order: No.18 (fo. 1 r, staves 1-5 and 7- 11); No.1 (fo. 1 v, staves 1-4 and 5-8); No.2 (from fo. 1v, the middle of staves 1-6, to fo. 2r, the middle of staves 1-6); and No.21 (from fo. 2r, the middle of staves 1-6, to fo. 2v, the middle of staves 1-6). There is no contemporary wrapper, nor any attribution on the score; a notation by Aloys Fuchs on a later wrapper attests to Leopold Mozart's handwriting. The dating of the manuscript is uncertain. Because the paper is of local Salzburg manufacture, it is unlikely to have been copied in Vienna when the Mozarts visited there in 1762 (although it is possible that Leopold took a stock of Salzburg paper with him to the Imperial capital. Atypically, the paper is hand-ruled with twelve staves per side). And a date of 1779-1780, when Don Juan was performed in Salzburg by the travelling troupe of Johann Böhm, is probably too late: this particular paper-type was used in Salzburg only until early 1772. The most probable date of copying is therefore sometime during the 1760s. Leopold Mozart's source for the dances is unknown. Although the score hews closely to Gluck's original, it nevertheless includes some changes, suggesting it was copied from a secondary or tertiary source. At measure 12 of No.18, for example, Leopold Mozart's autograph has the double stop (sounding) b'/e', where Gluck has a unison b'; in the same dance, at measure 25, Gluck has the dynamic piano in all the parts, while Leopold Mozart writes mez. for. for the first and second violins only. Similarly, in No.21, Leopold writes Maestoso over the first violin part; Gluck has Grazioso. And at measures 4 and 8 of the first violin part, Leopold has two quarter-notes for the first violin, which conflicts with the 8th notes and 8th-rests in the second violin, violas and basses. There also appears to be an intentional change in texture for the string basses at measure 9 (see below). Throughout this edition, editorial slurs are dotted and editorial dynamics are given in square brackets; added text, including tempo and character indications, is given in italics. Slurs have not been added automatically to connect grace notes and main notes; although Leopold Mozart prescribed the universal performance of such slurs (Versuch einer gründlichen Violinschule [Augsburg, 1756], pp.193-4), even the examples in his book regularly dispense with them. It is not out of the question that the notation of such a slur is significant, and I have accordingly reproduced the text as it stands in the source. Several details of Leopold Mozart's score are either unclear or ambiguous, especially when compared to Gluck's original. Performers may wish to reconsider the following details. No.18 Gluck's tempo indication is Allegro giustoso; Leopold Mozart's is Allegro gustoso. In Leopold Mozart's score, slurs are consistently omitted in the first violin, contrasting with the slurred 8ths in the second violin and viola. In Gluck's original, successive 8th-notes in the first violin are slurred. No. 1 M.7: In the Gluck, the first four 8ths in the first violin are articulated with a stroke on the first note, and a slur connecting the next three notes, contrary to the second violins; in Leopold Mozart's score the slurring is identical in both parts: two slurs of two notes each. Similarly, in the Gluck, the last two 8ths for violin 1 and 2 are given with strokes; Leopold Mozart has slurs. No.2 Gluck's original includes parts for oboes that double the first violins throughout; these are omitted in Leopold Mozart's score. No.21 Leopold Mozart gives no tempo or characterization designation; Grazioso has been taken over from Gluck's original. Throughout, the figure including a quarter note followed by four 8th notes is invariably given in Leopold Mozart's score without articulation. The original sensibly articulates the four 8th notes with dots under a slur (see vn.1: mm. 1 , 5, 7, 17, 23, 25, 35, 37, 39, 41; vn.2:mm. 2, 6, 18, 21, 23, 36, 40; va: mm. 2, 6, 18, 22, 29, 36, 40; basso: mm. 2, 6, 18, 36, 40; horns: 1 , 5, 17, 25, 29, 35, 39). The final 8th of m.26 in the second violins, viola and basso, which involves a pitch change, is an exception: here Leopold Mozart has included articulation for the second violin, which has been added editorially to the viola and basso parts. Mm.9 and 31, string basses: the original includes a direction to play pizzicato, similar to the first and second violins; Leopold Mozart's score omits the pizzicato for the string basses at m.9. Possibly the change is intentional: Mozart at first wrote pizzicato for the string basses but subsequently crossed it out. On the other hand, pizzicato is indicated at m.31. Accordingly, the passages can be standardized or left to stand as in the autograph, presenting subtle textural differences. Mm.35-42: Mozart's score sends at m.34 with the direction D:C: [Da Capo], without indicating earlier on or where the dance is to end. Similar to Gluck's original, I have appended measures 1-8 with the difference, however, that the final measure of the piece has not been changed to half-notes. Cliff Eisen

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 8019119057

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.4 ★★★★★
Based on 26 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
R
Verified Purchase
Richard
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 3
Ok. Not great
Size: 8.5 Wide, Color: Brown
They look great but not that comfortable
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 6, 2026
N
Verified Purchase
noelani
Dallas, US
★★★★★ 5
Stylish, comfortable, and a great price.
Size: 11, Color: Dark/Blue, Size: 11, Color: Dark/Blue
Can't beat the quality at this price. This is my 2nd pair, my last pair (in brown) lasting almost 3 years as a work shoe in a dusty warehouse. Nice and light. Fitment is true to size. Very good looking and comfortable shoe. I suggest insoles as the soles are a little thin and can be rough on a bad back. And they squeak on the floor after they age. But again, for the price you can't beat these shoes. Did, would, and will buy again.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 13, 2026
L
Verified Purchase
lgutz57
Draper, US
★★★★★ 5
Nice shoe, sizing information on this review
Size: 9, Color: Grey, Size: 9, Color: Grey
Ok, let's talk Breeze Mesh Sneakers by Bruno Marc (Grey)...... Firstly, they are nicely stylish appearance wise. They are lightweight (which I like). They feel comfortable and easy to walk in. I have not owned them very long, so I can't inform you on long term wear or how they feel after months of use. I own many pairs of shoes, mostly running type shoes. I needed a pair like these to wear in a more formal situation. Maybe with some dress pants or nice jeans. Now let's discuss the SIZING which is very important to me. Without a good fit, your shoes will never feel right when wearing. I normally wear size 9 in Men's. I seen someone mention that they 'run small'. I can do 9.5 in those situations, so I ordered 9.5. When they arrived and I tried them on, it was obvious they were too big. too much toe room in front. So I returned them for my normal size which is 9 Men's. Much better. AND, i still have toe room in front (no tightness). My suggestion to you is to order your normal size. The shoes feel like quality shoes and I feel that are a good purchase (for the price). The shoes came quickly. Bruno Marc is a good overall shoe. Hope this information helps.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2026
F
Verified Purchase
FTL
San Leandro, US
★★★★★ 5
Great shoes
Size: 10.5, Color: Dark Grey
I saw people wearing shoes like this in the office (maybe not the same brand), so I ordered a pair to see how they feel. They feel amazing. It's basically sneaker that look ok to be worn with pants and sport jacket. Fit is great, I ordered my usual size and they fit nicely. Sole is thick enough to make them comfortable, not too thick to looks like a sport sneaker. Durability seems ok, wore them couple of times, so I can't really tell, but they seems like they can last long time.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 26, 2026
S
Verified Purchase
Sean Farley
New York, US
★★★★★ 4
These shoes adequately do the job they're meant to do
Size: 11, Color: Black, Size: 11, Color: Black
For shoes to wear daily for work, these are absolutely perfect. I give four stars simply because they are not 100% perfect; that is, they are a reflection of their cost and durability. With that said, these shoes are perfect for my role as a professor AND a person who walks half a mile from the train station to class and back 5x a week. Comfortable. Nice cushion on the heel. And they look really amazing - classy but not pretentious. I bought a second pair a week after the first just so I could have different colors, and it is likely I will get a third pair. For $40-ish dollars, they do the job they're meant to and they do it well. This picture shown are the originals I bought, but I also got the black pair, too.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 25, 2026

recommand products